Thursday, 18 April 2013

Monsanto’s Dirty Dozen


The Twelve Most Awful Products Made By Monsanto

By JacobSloan on in News


Via GMO Awareness, it may seem cartoonish to brand one company as an evil empire reaping misery over the course of a century, but it’s hard not to when they have created artificial sugar substitutes, DDT, Agent Orange, nuclear weapons, PCBs, and Bovine Growth Hormone:
When you take a moment to reflect on the history of product development at Monsanto, what do you find? Here are twelve products that Monsanto has brought to market:
1. Saccharin. John Francisco Queeny founded Monsanto Chemical Works with the goal of producing saccharin for Coca-Cola. Studies performed during the early 1970s showed that saccharin caused cancer in test rats and mice.
2. PCBs. During the early 1920s, Monsanto began expanding their chemical production into polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to produce coolant fluids for electrical transformers and motors. Fifty years later, the EPA published a report citing PCBs as the cause of cancer in animals, with additional evidence that they can cause cancer in humans. Nearly 30 years after PCBs have been banned from the U.S., they are still showing up in the blood of pregnant women, as reported in a 2011 study.
3. Polystyrene. In 1941, Monsanto began focusing on plastics and synthetic polystyrene, which is still widely used in food packaging and ranked 5th in the EPA’s 1980s listing of chemicals whose production generates the most total hazardous waste.
4. Atom bomb and nuclear weapons. Shortly after acquiring Thomas and Hochwalt Laboratories, Monsanto turned this division into their Central Research Department. Between 1943 to 1945, this department coordinated key production efforts of the Manhattan Project.
5. DDT. In 1944, Monsanto became one of the first manufacturers of the insecticide DDT to combat malaria-transmitting mosquitoes. In 1972, DDT was banned throughout the U.S.
Read the rest at GMO Awareness.

Sunday, 14 April 2013

4
Annex 1: Government of Ghana Key Policy Commitments
SEE: Ghana_web.pdf http://feedthefuture.gov/sites/default/files/resource/files/Ghana_web.pdf 

Policy Indicators
 Improved score on Doing Business Index
 Increased $ value of new private-sector investment in the agricultural sector
 % increase in private investment in commercial production and sale of seeds

Objective
Framework Policy Actions
Timeline
Establish policy that enables theprivate sector to develop,commercialize, and use improved inputs to increase smallholder productivity and incomes
1.
Regulations developed to implement the new seed law, specifically:
Seed registry system established.
Protocols for variety testing, release and registration, authorization to conduct field inspections, seed sampling, and seed testing developed.
Standards for seed classification and certification established. June 2013
2.
New agricultural input policy for fertilizer and certified seed use developed that includes:
Clearly defined role of government in fertilizer and seed marketing;
Clearly defined role of government’s CSIR and Grains & Legumes Board; and
Defined role of private sector in breeding. December 2013
Create a secure investment climate for investors by reducing transaction costs and risks
3.
Database of suitable land for investors established*
1,000 ha registered December 2013
4,500 ha registered December 2014
10,000 ha registered December 2015
4.
Pilot model lease agreements** for 5,000 ha of land in database established. December 2015
5.
Clear procedures to channel investor interest (including that related to value-added agricultural processing) to appropriate agencies*** completed. December 2013
Support transparent, inclusive, evidence-based policy formulation process based on quality data and sound evidence that leads to increased investment in agriculture
6.
New Ghana Agricultural Production Survey (GAPS)stood up:
Piloted data release July 2012
2nd phase completed September 2013
New national agriculture survey data released May 2014
7.
Private sector representatives of key grain value chains appointed to the MOFA Post HarvestCommittee.**** December 2013
* This database is essentially a ‘land bank’ but in the Ghanaian context it’s a land database. In the case of land under traditional ownership, due diligence and sensitization of surrounding communities will promote an understanding of the rights and obligations from subsequent lease agreements.
**For outgrower schemes, contract farming, etc.
*** To provide a transparent and structured way for investors of all types to avoid extra transaction costs and need to reduce their perceived risk of approaching government to manage access to, and security of land.
**** This is a recommendation made by the private sector. This committee establishes the floor price for the National Buffer Stock Company (NAFCO)

Farmers and Consumers V. Monsanto: David Meet Goliath


Farmers and Consumers V. Monsanto: David Meet Goliath | Common Dreams https://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/04/08-7

G8 Cooperation Framework to Support the “New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition” in Ghana


Ghana New Alliance Cooperation Framework

September 25th, 2012
Download the Country Cooperation Framework for Ghana (pdf, 945kb), which describes the vision for partnership and mutual commitments between the the Government of Ghana, donors, and the private sector, as part of the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition.

1
G8 Cooperation Framework to Support the “New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition” in Ghana
Three years after the G8 Summit at L’Aquila, Italy, the international community recognizes the importance of food security to development, inclusive economic growth and the dignity of all
women and men. In that spirit, we welcome the success of the Comprehensive Africa
Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) in demonstrating African ownership and leadership,
its call for expanded public and private investment in agriculture and desire to build on the
progress that African governments have made in advancing a vision for agricultural
development in Africa. 
Ghana is making great strides in public-private partnership in agricultural growth, exemplified
by the development of its Ghana Commercial Agriculture Program. This strategic investment
blueprint is a model for inclusive and strategic collaboration among government, donors and
the private sector. Together, the Government of Ghana and the G8 members, commit to the “New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition” and to working together to generate greater private investment in agricultural development, scale innovation, achieve sustainable food security outcomes, reduce poverty and end hunger. As partners, we commit ourselves to the following principles and actions: 
Support of CAADP Country Compacts
The G8 members, consistent with commitments made at L’Aquila, reaffirm their intention toalign their agricultural financial and technical support with the priorities of the CAADP National Investment Plan for Agriculture and Food Security (referred to in Ghana as the Medium Term Agriculture Sector Investment Plan or METASIP), in such a manner as to accelerate implementation of the METASIP and in conjunction with commitments made by the Government of Ghana. Consistent with the foregoing, the G8 members recognize the value of predictability of donor activities including financial and technical support over a sustained period of time, as set out in Annex 2. 
The G8 members intend to provide support within the agriculture sector to accelerate implementation of the METASIP, including through the Grow Africa platform, with the overall goal of facilitating increases in private investment and scaling innovation. The G8 members intend to engage the relevant agencies of their member governments and also to bring to bear appropriate enabling actions to accelerate progress in the areas of finance and markets, science and technology, and risk management. To address the underlying causes of food insecurity, the G8 members intend to focus key resources and other contributions on high-priority, high-impact investments within the METASIP and in particular on the development of the 2Government of Ghana’s priority area of the Savannah Accelerated Development Authority region of northern Ghana and other deprived areas.
Key Policy Commitments
The Government of Ghana intends to pursue the policy goals set out below in order to build domestic and international private sector confidence to increase agricultural investment significantly, with the overall goal of reducing poverty and ending hunger. The Government of Ghana intends to improve incentives for private sector investment in agriculture, in particular, taking actions to facilitate inclusive access to and productive use of land; developing and implementing domestic seed regulations that encourage increased private sector involvement in this area; and supporting transparent inclusive, evidence-based policy formulation (see Annex 1).
The Government of Ghana reaffirms its intention to provide the human and financial resources and the mechanisms for dialogue with the private sector, farmers and other stakeholders, and across government ministries that are required for the achievement of tangible and sustainable outcomes, the acceleration of Ghana’s development, and the delivery of tangible benefits to smallholder farmers, including women.
The Government of Ghana reaffirms its commitment to mainstream nutrition in all food security and agriculture-related programs.
Private Sector Engagement
Private sector representatives have communicated that they intend to invest in the agriculture sector in Ghana in support of the CAADP National Investment Plan for Agriculture and Food Security (the METASIP), through in Letters of Intent that they will prepare and execute, and intend to advise, shape, and participate in broad, inclusive and sustained private sector consultative mechanisms with the host government (see Annex 3).
Shared Responsibilities
The G8 members, the Government of Ghana and the private sector, confirm their intention to take account of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (“the Voluntary Guidelines”) adopted by the Committee on World Food Security in May 2012, as well as the Principles of Responsible Agricultural Investment (PRAI) produced by several international organizations and endorsed by among others, the G8 and G20, which are undergoing a consultative process through the Committee on World Food Security on PRAI. In addition, they intend to work

4 Annex 1:
Government of Ghana Key Policy Commitments
Policy Indicators
 Improved score on Doing Business Index
 Increased $ value of new private-sector investment in the agricultural sector
 % increase in private investment in commercial production and sale of seeds

Objective
Framework Policy Actions
Timeline
Establish policy that enables the private sector to develop, commercialize, and use improved inputs to increase smallholder productivity and incomes
1. Regulations developed to implement the new seed law, specifically: Seed registry system established. Protocols for variety testing, release and registration, authorization to conduct field inspections, seed sampling, and seed testing developed. Standards for seed classification and certification established. June 2013
2. New agricultural input policy for fertilizer and certified seed use developed that includes:Clearly defined role of government in fertilizer and seed marketing; Clearly defined role of government’s CSIR and Grains & Legumes Board; and Defined role of private sector in breeding. December 2013Create a secure investment climate for investors by reducing transaction costs and risksDatabase of suitable land for investors established*
1,000 ha registered December 2013
4,500 ha registered December 2014
10,000 ha registered December 2015

.Pilot model lease agreements** for 5,000 ha of land in database established.December 2015.Clear procedures to channel investor interest (including that related to value-added agricultural processing) to appropriate agencies*** completed. December 2013
Support transparent, inclusive, evidence-based policy formulation process based on quality data and sound evidence that leads to increased investment in agriculture
6. New Ghana Agricultural Production Survey (GAPS)stood up:
Piloted data release July 2012
2nd phase completed September 2013
New national agriculture survey data released May 2014
7. Private sector representatives of key grain value chains appointed to the MOFA Post HarvestCommittee.**** December 2013
* This database is essentially a ‘land bank’ but in the Ghanaian context it’s a land database. In the case of land under traditional ownership, due diligence and
sensitization of surrounding communities will promote an understanding of the rights and obligations from subsequent lease agreements.
**For outgrower schemes, contract farming, etc.
*** To provide a transparent and structured way for investors of all types to avoid extra transaction costs and need to reduce their perceived risk of approaching government to manage access to, and security of land.
**** This is a recommendation made by the private sector. This committee establishes the floor price for the National Buffer Stock Company (NAFCO)

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

What Every Parent Should Know About Monsanto



Posted: 04/04/2013 5:47 pm, Environment , Food , Nutrition , Organic Food , Agent Orange...
Keeping our children from harm in today's chemically-saturated world is one of the great challenges of modern parenting. The more I read the news, the more I want to look for toddler-sized quarantine suits on Etsy, but the most proactive way I can protect my daughter is to keep myself educated on these issues -- even if that means I get forehead wrinkles from excessive worry. In addition to the health of my child, I fear for the ecological health of the planet. Last time I checked, Earth is the only place we have to live, and what kind of future am I providing for my daughter if I am not cognizant of how my life, and the decisions of my government, effect our environment? That is why every parent should be aware of the Monsanto Protection Act and what it means for their family.

When President Obama signed the Monsanto Protection Act, many citizens were outraged by this blatant violation of the Constitution. By approving this act, Obama has allowed Monsanto to exist above the law, since genetically modified seeds are now protected from any litigation involving health risks. That is strange, right? If you were confident in your product, why would you be concerned about lawsuits involving health risks? You may wonder how this applies to you, considering you don't buy Monsanto-Oh's for breakfast, but essentially, you are. Monsanto's genetically engineered corn, soy, wheat and beet crops have infiltrated our entire food system, and you could be eating their products every day and not even realizing it... READ MORE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/toni-nagy/what-every-parent-should-_b_3008452.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003

Definition of Food Sovereignty

Nyéléni 2007: Forum for Food Sovereignty

Definition of Food Sovereignty
Food sovereignty is the right of peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems. It puts the aspirations and needs of those who produce, distribute and consume food at the heart of food systems and policies rather than the demands of markets and corporations. It defends the interests and inclusion of the next generation. It offers a strategy to resist and dismantle the current corporate trade and food regime, and directions for food, farming, pastoral and fisheries systems determined by local producers and users. Food sovereignty prioritises local and national economies and markets and empowers peasant and family farmer-driven agriculture, artisanal - fishing, pastoralist-led grazing, and food production, distribution and consumption based on environmental, social and economic sustainability. Food sovereignty promotes transparent trade that guarantees just incomes to all peoples as well as the rights of consumers to control their food and nutrition. It ensures that the rights to use and manage lands, territories, waters, seeds, livestock and biodiversity are in the hands of those of us who produce food. Food sovereignty implies new social relations free of oppression and inequality between men and women, peoples, racial groups, social and economic classes and generations. Source: http://www.foodsovereignty.org/Aboutus/WhatisIPC.aspx

Friday, 5 April 2013

Obama Promises 'Immediate' GMO Labeling in 2007 Speech

Obama Promises 'Immediate' GMO Labeling in 2007 Speech

Published on 7 Nov 2012
Obama promised 'immediate' labeling of GMOs (genetically modified organisms) amid serious demand for labeling from upwards of 93-95% of citizens conservatively based on numbers from numerous polling organizations. http://youtu.be/8WveF8YjYEE

Genetic Engineering, Eugenics and the Ideology of the Rich

By Colin Todhunter

Whatever the publicly stated aims of the genetically modified organisms (GMOs) sector, and however terrible its impact is on health, the environment and cotton farmers in India, there is a much more sinister side to this industry.

In order to govern and control a population, apart from the use of violence, people’s consent must be achieved via what Louis Althusser once called ideological state apparatuses: the education system, entertainment, religion, the political system and so on. Noam Chomsky’s book ‘The Manufacture of Consent’ discusses the important role of the media in this, and Antonio Gramsci wrote much about hegemony – the methods used by the dominant class to legitimize their position in the eyes of the ruled over – a kind of ‘consented coercion’ that disguises the true fist of power.
However, possibly the most basic and arguably effective form of social control is eugenics, a philosophy that includes reduced reproductive capacity of ‘less desired’ people.

There is a growing fear that eugenics is being used for the purpose of population control – to get rid of sections of the world population that are ‘surplus to requirements’. In the West, due to automation and the outsourcing of jobs, there is likely to be a large section of the population that will be permanently unemployed or underemployed. In places like China, Africa and India, promoting birth control has been high on the agenda for some decades.

Millionaire US media baron Ted Turner believes a global population of two billion would be ideal and billionaire Bill Gates has pledged hundreds of millions of dollars to improve access to contraception in the developing world. Based on the misguided premise that the world is getting overpopulated, fewer people means elites and the better off can reduce the competition for the resources they covert so much and maintain their current high levels of material consumption. Gates has also purchased shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. His agenda is to help Monsanto get their genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into Africa on a grand scale.

Here’s where things get interesting. In 2001, Monsanto and Du Pont bought a small biotech company called Epicyte that had created a gene that basically makes the male sperm sterile and the female egg unreceptive. In the US, GM foods are already on the market and unlabeled. The GM sector has spent millions to ensure this remains the case. US citizens thus have no idea of what could be in their food. These foods where not independently tested for their impact on health.

Would you like to know whether you are eating stuff that (according to Professor Seralini of the University of Caen in France) damages health?

Would you like to know if what you are eating contains something that could make you sterile?

Bill Gates’ father has long been involved with Planned Parenthood:
“When I was growing up, my parents were always involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that.”

The above quotation comes from a 2003 interview with Bill Gates.
Planned Parenthood was founded on the concept that most human beings are reckless breeders. Gates senior is co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and a guiding light behind the vision and direction of the Gates Foundation, which is heavily focused on promoting GMOs in Africa via its financing of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA).

 The Gates Foundation has given at least $264.5 million to AGRA. According to a report published by La Via Campesina (The Peasants’ Way) in 2010, 70 percent of AGRA’s grantees in Kenya work directly with Monsanto and nearly 80 percent of the Gates Foundation funding is devoted to biotechnology. The report also explains that the Gates Foundation has pledged $880 million to create the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), which is a heavy promoter of GMOs.

Rather than embrace a move towards genuine food sovereignty and address the underlying political and economic issues that cause poverty, the Gates Foundation has chosen the promotion of corporate-controlled agriculture which has led to the disempowerment of farmers.

As the GM sector continues to hammer at India’s door, we have every right to be concerned, not only because of the much reported impact of seed monopolies and GMOs’ well-documented detrimental effects on health and the environment, but also because of concerns over just which genes may be in the foodstuffs that we eat and are unknown to us.

Researcher F William Engdahl states that genetic engineering cannot be understood without looking at the global spread of US power. Leading figures in the US financed ‘Green Revolution’ in the agriculture sector of developing countries in order to create new markets for petro-chemical fertilizers and petroleum products, as well as to expand dependency on energy products. Food has now become weaponised to secure global dominance.

The world’s problems are not being caused by overpopulation, but by greed and a system of ownership that ensures wealth flows from bottom to top. It’s not about stopping population growth in its tracks, but about changing a widespread global system and mindset that is based an over reliance on oil and unsustainable depletion of natural resources, with the US being the biggest culprit.


Millionaires like Ted Turner believe it should be a case of carry on consuming regardless, as long as the population is cut. This is the ideology of the rich who regard the rest of humanity as a problem to be ‘dealt with.’ He says there are “too many people using too much stuff.” He couldn’t be more wrong. For instance, developing nations account for more than 80 percent of world population, but consume only about one third of the world’s energy. US citizens constitute 5 percent of the world’s population but consume 24 percent of the world’s energy. On average, one American consumes as much energy as two Japanese, six Mexicans, 13 Chinese, 31 Indians, 128 Bangladeshis, 307 Tanzanians and 370 Ethiopians (mindfully.org)

So, should we be weary of a hugely politically connected sector that has ownership of technology that allows for the genetic engineering of food and a gene that could be used (or already is) for forced sterilization? Of course we should. This is a sector whose stated objective is to control the world’s food chain and, by implication, the global population.

In today’s technologically-driven world, state-corporate concerns are using the full panoply of hi-tech means to control us. Some decades ago, theorist and social philosopher Herbert Marcuse summed up the problem facing modern society by saying that the capabilities— both intellectual and technological— of contemporary society are immeasurably greater than before, which means that the scope of society’s domination over the individual is also immeasurably greater than ever before. It appears none more so than where the GM sector is concerned.

Thursday, 4 April 2013

Obama Slammed For Signing So-Called 'Monsanto Protection Act' (VIDEO)

Obama Slammed For Signing So-Called 'Monsanto Protection Act' (VIDEO)

HuffPost Live | Posted: 04/01/2013 7:49 pm EDT

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

Monsanto Protection Act Signed into Law



By Marjan Asi, Press TV, Washington
While the hotly contested sequester was met with great fanfare in Washington, a little noticed provision protecting biotech corporations slipped virtually unnoticed into law. The so-called Monsanto Protection Act has now raised concerns for food safety groups and many are calling for its veto. 

The recent spending bill which threatened a government shutdown was signed into law last week, easing the minds of many Washington politicians. But lesser known is Section 735 of the bill, officially titled the Farmer Assurance Provision but since nicknamed the Monsanto Rider or the Monsanto Protection Act.

The provision protects large biotechnology companies like Monsanto from being taken to federal court should a genetically modified organism be discovered as being harmful to the consumer.
Some Congress people argue that the provision was a necessary concession in order to pass the spending bill to prevent a total shutdown of the federal government. But according to Colin O'Neil of the Center for Food Safety, this did not have to be the case.

Over 250,000 people have signed a petition demanding President Obama veto the Monsanto Protection Act.

Food advocacy groups are not the only ones upset. Civil rights organizations have also come out against this provision because of the secret nature in which it was passed, having been slipped into the bill not long before it was signed into law.

The provision did not follow traditional ways and was not discussed or debated in the appropriate Congressional committees.

Because the provision was passed as part of the spending bill and not as its own legislation, it is set to expire in six months. But many fear the possibility of the act becoming more permanent legislation.

President Obama has previously pushed for policies in favor of GMOs. In 2011, genetically-engineered alfalfa and sugar beets were deregulated in the United States.